Château d’Armailhac 2009

2 minute read

WineMine Description

MyWineMine gives this wine a score of 903; outperforming the average for the sub-region in 2009 which is 0. The average score for is 861, making this an above average effort for the producer.

When people talk about wines from they use words like . People use these words to describe the 2009 but no other wine from : . The wine has been ready to drink for 2 years (since 2014) and should be consumed within the next 9 years (by 2025).

It represents good value compared to Château Palmer 2012, Château Rauzan-Ségla 2012, Château Rauzan-Ségla 2010, Château Cos d’Estournel 2005, Château Rauzan-Ségla 2005; but better value alternatives would be Château Rauzan-Ségla 2014, Château Gloria 2009, Château Langoa-Barton 2006, Château Labégorce 2010, Château Figeac 2012.

MyWineMine has compared this wine to all others it has scored; this wine offers average value for money when looking at the price per point of MyWineMine Score.

Similarity Score	Wine	Price Difference
132	Château Palmer 2012	267%
116	Château Rauzan-Ségla 2012	-4%
111	Château Rauzan-Ségla 2010	153%
90	Château Cos d’Estournel 2005	291%
85	Château Rauzan-Ségla 2005	124%
85	Château Margaux 2006	640%
85	Château Haut-Brion 2008	46%
83	Château Palmer 2009	410%
80	Château Palmer 2005	408%
78	Château Palmer 2008	122%
78	Château Léoville-Poyferré 2005	77%
78	Château Giscours 2005	93%
77	Château Branaire-Ducru 2010	-4%
77	Château Rauzan-Ségla 2014	10%
77	Château Brane-Cantenac 2010	49%
76	Château Clos Fourtet 2009	216%
76	Château La Mission-Haut-Brion 2005	644%
76	Château Ausone 2010	2209%
76	Château Margaux 2008	409%
76	Château Margaux 2010	1808%
76	Château Rauzan-Ségla 2005	124%
76	Château Haut-Brion 2009	903%
75	Château Margaux 2006	640%
75	Château La Mission-Haut-Brion 2009	881%
74	Château Léoville-Poyferré 2010	126%
74	Château Giscours 2009	5%
74	Château Haut-Brion 2010	1344%
73	Château Talbot 2010	-12%
73	Château Brane-Cantenac 2009	108%
73	Château Figeac 2012	-38%

Date	Currency	Price
2016-01-05	gbp	38