Château d’Armailhac 2000
WineMine Description
MyWineMine gives this wine a score of 843; outperforming the average for the sub-region in 2000 which is 0. The average score for is 863, making this a below average effort for the producer.
When people talk about wines from they use words like . People use these words to describe the 2000 but no other wine from : . The wine has been ready to drink for 4 years (since 2012) and should be consumed within the next 2 years (by 2018).
It represents good value compared to Château Palmer 2012, Château Rauzan-Ségla 2010, Château Cos d’Estournel 2005, Château Haut-Brion 2008, Château Palmer 2009; but better value alternatives would be Château Rauzan-Ségla 2012, Château Talbot 2005, Château Léoville-Poyferré 2006, Château Branaire-Ducru 2010, Château Labégorce 2010.
MyWineMine has compared this wine to all others it has scored; this wine offers average value for money when looking at the price per point of MyWineMine Score.
Similar Wines from Nearby
| Similarity Score | Wine | Price Difference |
|---|---|---|
| 90 | Château Lafite Rothschild 2008 | 806% |
| 88 | Château Grand-Puy-Lacoste 2008 | -62% |
| 84 | Château Lynch-Bages 2011 | -7% |
| 74 | Les Forts de Latour 2009 | 68% |
| 62 | Château Pontet-Canet 2005 | 35% |
| 61 | Les Forts de Latour 2005 | 59% |
| 61 | Château Latour 2003 | 866% |
| 58 | Château Grand-Puy-Lacoste 2009 | -36% |
| 54 | Château Mouton Rothschild 2006 | 446% |
| 53 | Château Mouton Rothschild 2011 | 277% |
| 52 | Château Lynch-Bages 2005 | 29% |
| 52 | Château Clerc-Milon 2010 | -14% |
| 52 | Château Pontet-Canet 2005 | 35% |
| 51 | Château Mouton Rothschild 2005 | 331% |
| 51 | Château Latour 2003 | 866% |
| 51 | Château Lynch-Bages 2008 | 4% |
| 51 | Château Latour 2009 | 1270% |
| 51 | Les Forts de Latour 2006 | 134% |
| 51 | Château Pontet-Canet 2009 | 73% |
| 50 | Château Latour 1996 | 871% |
| 50 | Château Grand-Puy-Lacoste 2005 | -12% |
| 50 | Château Pontet-Canet 2008 | -26% |
| 50 | Château Pontet-Canet 2007 | -44% |
Similar Wines from Other Regions
| Similarity Score | Wine | Price Difference |
|---|---|---|
| 92 | Château Palmer 2012 | 120% |
| 78 | Château Rauzan-Ségla 2012 | -42% |
| 75 | Château Rauzan-Ségla 2010 | 52% |
| 61 | Château Cos d’Estournel 2005 | 135% |
| 59 | Château Haut-Brion 2008 | -12% |
| 58 | Château Margaux 2006 | 345% |
| 57 | Château Palmer 2009 | 206% |
| 57 | Château Labégorce 2010 | -59% |
| 56 | Château Talbot 2009 | -29% |
| 56 | Château Léoville-Poyferré 2006 | -52% |
| 56 | Château Léoville-Poyferré 2010 | 36% |
| 56 | Château La Mission-Haut-Brion 2005 | 347% |
| 56 | Château Léoville-Poyferré 2005 | 7% |
| 55 | Château Talbot 2005 | -38% |
| 55 | Château Figeac 2012 | -63% |
| 54 | Château Rauzan-Ségla 2005 | 35% |
| 54 | Château Palmer 2005 | 205% |
| 54 | Château Gloria 2009 | -63% |
| 53 | Château Branaire-Ducru 2010 | -42% |
| 53 | Château Margaux 2010 | 1047% |
| 52 | Château Gloria 2010 | -53% |
| 51 | Château Cheval Blanc 2004 | 234% |
| 51 | Château Haut-Brion 2010 | 768% |
| 51 | Château Giscours 2005 | 16% |
| 50 | Château Talbot 2010 | -47% |
| 50 | Château Margaux 2008 | 206% |
| 49 | Château Cheval Blanc 2012 | 309% |
Prices & Deals for Château d’Armailhac 2000
| Date | Currency | Price |
|---|---|---|
| 2016-01-17 | gbp | 55 |
| 2016-01-05 | gbp | 58 |