Château Palmer 2006

2 minute read

WineMine Description

MyWineMine gives this wine a score of 910; outperforming the average for the sub-region in 2006 which is 868. The average score for Château Palmer is 931, making this a below average effort for the producer.

When people talk about wines from Château Palmer they use words like Fruit, Full, Black, Tannins, Sweet, Long, Rich, Licorice, Deep, Purple, Dark, Dense, Ripe, Silky, Velvety. The 2006 shares most of these characteristics. People use these words to describe the 2006 but no other wine from Château Palmer: Splendid, Personality, Toast, Underbrush, Melted. The wine has approximately standard levels of alcohol for the producer (13% vs 13.14%); it has average levels of alcohol for the region in 2006 (13% vs 13.01%). The wine has been ready to drink for 2 years (since 2014) and should be consumed within the next 12 years (by 2028). It normally takes wines from Château Palmer around 8 years to be ready to start drinking, and 17 further years to decline.

It represents good value compared to Château La Mission-Haut-Brion 2005, Château Cos d’Estournel 2005, Les Forts de Latour 2005, Château Pontet-Canet 2009, Château Margaux 2006; but better value alternatives would be Château Rauzan-Ségla 2005, Château Pontet-Canet 2005, Château Grand-Puy-Lacoste 2009, Château Brane-Cantenac 2009, Château d’Issan 2010.

MyWineMine has compared this wine to all others it has scored; this wine offers below average value for money when looking at the price per point of MyWineMine Score, 70% of wines are better value.

Similar Wines from Nearby

Similarity Score Wine Price Difference
57 Château Rauzan-Ségla 2005 -7%
51 Château Margaux 2006 208%
50 Château Brane-Cantenac 2009 -13%
49 Château Margaux 2005 496%
48 Château d’Issan 2010 -51%
47 Château Rauzan-Ségla 2005 -7%
46 Château Margaux 2010 694%
46 Château Giscours 2005 -20%
45 Château Labégorce 2010 -72%
45 Château Rauzan-Ségla 2012 -60%
45 Château Rauzan-Ségla 2014 -54%
45 Château Rauzan-Ségla 2012 -60%

Similar Wines from Other Regions

Similarity Score Wine Price Difference
53 Château Pontet-Canet 2005 -6%
52 Château La Mission-Haut-Brion 2005 209%
52 Château Cos d’Estournel 2005 63%
51 Les Forts de Latour 2005 10%
50 Château Grand-Puy-Lacoste 2009 -56%
50 Château Pontet-Canet 2009 20%
50 Château Ausone 2010 861%
48 Château Léoville-Poyferré 2010 -6%
47 Château La Mission-Haut-Brion 2009 308%
47 Château Figeac 2012 -74%
47 Château Latour 2003 569%
47 Château Haut-Brion 2009 317%
47 Château Mouton Rothschild 2006 278%
47 Château Haut-Brion 2008 -39%
47 Château Mouton Rothschild 2011 161%
47 Château Lafite Rothschild 2008 527%
47 Château Lafite Rothschild 2008 527%
47 Château Cheval Blanc 2004 131%
46 Château Grand-Puy-Lacoste 2010 -41%
46 Château Cheval Blanc 2005 312%
46 Château Haut-Bailly 2009 -4%
46 Château Haut-Brion 2011 84%
45 Château Haut-Brion 2010 501%
45 Château Pontet-Canet 2007 -62%
45 Château Gloria 2009 -75%
45 Château Latour 2011 177%
45 Château Latour 1996 572%
45 Château Clos Fourtet 2009 32%
45 Château Cos d’Estournel 2008 -43%
44 Château Palmer 2012 53%
44 Château Palmer 2012 53%
44 Château La Mission-Haut-Brion 2014 8%
44 Château Cheval Blanc 2006 220%
44 Château Talbot 2010 -63%
44 Château Pontet-Canet 2005 -6%
44 Vieux Château Certan 2004 -39%
43 Château Lynch-Bages 2011 -36%
43 Château Lynch-Bages 2008 -28%

Prices & Deals for Château Palmer 2006

Date Currency Price
2016-01-04 gbp 125
2015-04-04 gbp 104
2015-04-04 gbp 115

Updated: